ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring factors influencing the consistent adoption of a post-stroke upper extremity outcome measure using Normalisation Process Theory.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke rehabilitation guidelines recommend using outcome measures like the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) to assess post-stroke upper extremity function. However, integrating such outcome measures into routine clinical practice remains challenging, highlighting the need to understand factors affecting their implementation in evolving healthcare models.
objectiveOur study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to sustain the routine use of the FMA-UE among hospital-based occupational therapists (OTs) using a theory-driven approach.
methodsEmploying a mixed-method sequential exploratory study design rooted in Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), we gathered quantitative data through a validated survey followed by qualitative insights analysed with directed content analysis from focus group discussions involving occupational therapists from four hospitals.
resultsSurvey findings (n = 34) revealed barriers primarily associated with NPT constructs of collective action and coherence. Facilitators were linked to the cognitive participation construct. Key barriers identified in focus groups included insufficient coaching, competing priorities, and perceived limited value of the FMA-UE. Facilitators included legitimation of therapists' role in outcome measurements and an open learning culture.
conclusionsThrough a theory-based approach, we identified barriers and facilitators to sustain the routine of the FMA-UE. Our findings offer insights for designing implementation strategies to embed the FMA-UE into routine practice, supporting its sustained use in stroke rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.