ArticleBMC cancer2025
Real-world safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three cases of esophagorespiratory fistula following neoadjuvant DCF therapy for resectable esophageal cancer.International cancer conference journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-FU (DCF) has become the new standard of care for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In a real-world setting, the efficacy, recurrence, and adverse events (AEs) remain unclear.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 86 patients who received neoadjuvant DCF followed by esophagectomy for resectable ESCC.
resultsFollowing neoadjuvant DCF treatment, 75 patients underwent R0 curative resection. At the median follow-up of 19.2 months, the median disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS) was not yet reached, with estimated 3-year DFS/RFS rates of 65.2%, respectively. The incidence of primary tumor regression grading (TRG) grade 1a and pathological complete response (pCR) were 21.3% (16/75) and 14.7% (11/75), respectively. The estimated 1-year DFS/RFS rates were 93.8% for primary TRG grade 1a and 100% for pCR. Baseline elevated serum SCC-antigen levels were inversely associated with achieving primary TRG grade 1a or pCR. In 64 patients who did not achieve pCR, residual tumor cells in the lymph nodes (ypN; HR, 16.96; 95% CI, 2.11-136.12; P < 0.01) and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS; HR, 8.34; 95% CI, 1.73-40.31; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of shorter DFS/RFS. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (61.6%) and febrile neutropenia (26.7%), which were not associated with clinicopathological factors. The most common non-hematological AEs were appetite loss (9.3%), pulmonary embolism (8.1%), diarrhea (7.0%), and nausea (2.3%). Nine patients discontinued neoadjuvant DCF due to toxicities.
conclusionsNeoadjuvant DCF was effective and well-tolerated in real-world ESCC patients. Primary TRG grade 1a or pCR showed a favorable DFS/RFS, while positive ypN and GPS were independent risk factors for worse DFS/RFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.