Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200190›Full record

ReviewBMC surgery2025

Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: techniques, challenges, and survival outcomes: a comprehensive review.

Charles John Nhungo, Obadia Venance Nyongole, Charles Anaeli Mkony

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles John NhungoDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. charlesnhungo@gmail.com.
Obadia Venance NyongoleDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Charles Anaeli MkonyDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion remains the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), yet its implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa is hindered by late-stage presentation, limited surgical expertise, and inadequate perioperative care. These challenges contribute to higher morbidity and poorer survival outcomes compared to high-income regions. Additionally, the high prevalence of schistosomiasis-associated squamous cell carcinoma, disparities in multidisciplinary cancer care, and the burden of comorbidities further complicate treatment.This review examines RC techniques practiced in Africa, from open to minimally invasive approaches, assessing their feasibility within resource-limited settings. It explores challenges specific to the region, highlighting the impact of infrastructure gaps, limited access to neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, and variations in surgical training. Addressing these barriers requires urgent investment in oncology infrastructure, expanded access to multimodal therapy, and early detection strategies. Optimizing perioperative management and promoting cost-effective urinary diversion techniques are critical to improving bladder cancer outcomes in the region.

Indexed as

CystectomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAfrica South of the SaharaHumansTreatment OutcomeUrinary DiversionComplicationsMuscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)Radical cystectomy (RC)Survival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40200190
PMCPMC11978149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.