Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200169›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Unlocking the path to quality maternity care: a qualitative study on work environment dynamics, providers' responsiveness, and professionalism in central region, Malawi.

Bianca Kandeya, Wanangwa Chimwaza-Manda, Princess Kaira, Claudia Hanson, Dorcus Kiwanuka Henriksson, William Stones, Helle Molsted Alvesson, Effie Chipeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bianca KandeyaCenter for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi. bianca.kandeya@ki.se.
Wanangwa Chimwaza-MandaCenter for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Princess KairaCenter for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dorcus Kiwanuka HenrikssonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
William StonesCenter for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Helle Molsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Effie ChipetaCenter for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.

Funding

This study is part of the ALERT project which is funded by the European Commission's Horizon 2020. The research was funded by ALERT (No 847824, PI Claudia Hanson) under a call for implementation research for maternal and child health, and the Swedish Research Council (project number 2020-04949) No 847824, PI Claudia Hanson
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponsiveness and professionalism are essential components of high-quality maternity care. Responsiveness involves effective communication, respectful interactions, and consideration of the emotional, physical, and cultural needs of women, while professionalism encompasses clinical competence, ethical adherence, and respectful engagement with patients and colleagues. However, various workplace factors, including managerial structures, resource constraints, and institutional culture, influence the extent to which maternity care providers uphold these principles. This study aims to explore how organizational culture, management styles, and resource availability influence responsiveness and professionalism in Malawian maternity care settings, with the goal of identifying strategies to enhance provider motivation and improve maternal healthcare delivery.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted in two maternity care units in Malawi. Data were collected using Twelve semi-structured interviews, two focus group discussions and sixteen observations with maternity care providers in one faith-based hospital and one government-owned hospital, sampled purposively. Transcripts were imported into NVIVO 14 software, and a reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.

findingsThe study found that limited physical space, resource shortages, and heavy workloads constrained providers' ability to deliver responsive care. Rigid managerial structures, lack of professional recognition, and restricted autonomy contributed to low morale and reluctance to take initiative. Hierarchical power dynamics and inadequate institutional support further discouraged collaboration and accountability. Despite these challenges, providers highlighted the importance of teamwork, mutual support, and a positive work environment in fostering professionalism and responsiveness. Unpredictable work schedules and poor work-life balance also emerged as key concerns, impacting provider well-being and engagement.

conclusionThe study provides insights into the complex interplay of systemic, managerial, and interpersonal factors affecting responsiveness and professionalism in maternity care. Addressing these challenges requires targeted interventions that can strengthen resource allocation, supportive leadership, and policies that promote provider well-being and motivation which can in turn enhance maternal and newborn outcomes.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesProfessionalismQuality of Health CareWorkplaceAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalawiMotivationOrganizational CulturePregnancyQualitative ResearchWorking ConditionsMalawiMaternity care providersProfessionalismResponsivenessWork environment

Identifiers

PMID40200169
PMCPMC11980051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.