Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200168›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Doctor-patient communication in obesity disease - the perspective of Polish primary care physicians.

Iwona Drozdowska, Antonina Doroszewska, Tomasz Pasierski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Iwona DrozdowskaDepartment of Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.
Antonina DoroszewskaDepartment of Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland. antonina.doroszewska@wum.edu.pl.
Tomasz PasierskiDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a chronic disease that is affecting an increasing number of patients. The prevalence of obesity, the age of patients affected, and the range of associated comorbidities suggest that general practitioners will engage with this patient group extensively throughout their professional careers. It is regrettable that numerous obstacles impede the efficacious treatment of obesity by primary care physicians. These include inadequate training in obesity management and communication with patients, as well as a pervasive and problematic bias in the approach to the treatment of patients with obesity.

methodsThe objective of the study was to examine the knowledge, self-assessment, experiences and perceptions of primary care doctors in Poland with regard to the communication and management of obesity. The data were collected via computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). The sample was deliberately random selected from the available database of numbers. The inclusion criteria were aged 24 or over and active working as a primary care doctor in Poland. The research sample comprised 150 primary care doctors with various medical specialties, including the following: family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, endocrinology, diabetology, and others. An even distribution of participants was not ensured with respect to the parameters considered.

resultsThe findings of our study indicate that primary care physicians mostly disagreed with the view that patients living with obesity are less hardworking or more demanding but just over half disagreed that these patients are lazier than others. Doctors reported rarely using fear-based language or blaming excessive food consumption for obesity. Instead, many emphasized that obesity is a disease and considered the patient's perspective. Doctors who rated their communication skills and medical knowledge needed for conversations with patients living with obesity more highly were more likely to address this topic during a visit for an unrelated medical condition. Those who avoided the topic often felt they lacked the skills or knowledge to engage patients effectively. Almost half of the surveyed physicians had not received any training in communicating with patients living with obesity and only 11% had the issue addressed in a course for specialization. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The study indicates a necessity for changes in the curricula of both pre- and postgraduate education, including an enhancement of the knowledge and abilities of primary care providers in the domain of communication during visits with patients with obesity, the encouragement of lifestyle modifications and the implementation of efficacious treatments for obesity, as well as activities designed to modify the negative attitudes of primary care physicians towards patients living with obesity which should not appear in healthcare at all.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationObesityPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandCommunicationCommunication in obesity diseaseDoctor–patient relationshipGeneral practitionersObesityPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID40200168
PMCPMC11978183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.