ArticleBMC genomics2025
Genetic diversity and population structure in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) revealed by high-density DArTSeq SNP genotyping.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEthiopian mustard (Brassica carinata (A) Braun) is a promising oilseed crop with the potential for sustainable biofuel and bio-industrial applications. Despite the presence of diverse germplasms in Ethiopia, their genetic diversity remains largely unexplored. This study evaluated the genetic diversity and population structure of 188 B. carinata genotypes using high-density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers generated though DArTseq™ Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS). Of the 15,515 identified DArTSeq SNPs, 3,793 high-quality markers were retained and used to analyze the genetic diversity and population structure.
resultsThe results from STRUCTURE, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and neighbor-joining tree analyses revealed two slightly distinct subpopulations, with Pop1 predominantly comprising genotypes from the Oromia and Amhara regions (86.17%), whereas Pop2 primarily consisted of released varieties, suggests the influence of targeted selection. Despite the presence of subpopulations, PCoA indicated a relatively limited overall genetic diversity among the genotypes. Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) revealed higher genetic variation within populations (65.19%) than between populations (34.81%), resulting in low genetic differentiation (PhiPT = 0.02) and high gene flow (Nm = 5.74). Notably, subpopulation formation was not strongly correlated with geographical origin, highlights that factors beyond geography, such as gene flow and selection pressure, may have played a significant role in shaping the observed genetic diversity. Genetic diversity indices revealed a slightly low-to-moderate variation within the B. carinata populations, as evidenced by the slightly low expected heterozygosity (He = 0.21) and moderate polymorphic information content (PIC = 0.36).
conclusionOverall, this study revealed a moderate level of genetic diversity within the evaluated B. carinata genotypes. The results offer valuable insights into the genetic structure of this species and highlight the need for targeted strategies to enhance genetic diversity in future breeding initiatives and conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.