ArticleBMC genomics2025
A computational HLA allele-typing protocol to de-noise and leverage nanopore amplicon data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid turnaround time for a third-field resolution deceased donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing is critical to improve organ transplantation outcomes. Third generation DNA sequencing platforms such as Oxford Nanopore (ONT) offer the opportunity to deliver rapid results at single nucleotide level resolution, in particular sequencing data that could be denoised computationally. Here we present a computational pipeline for up-to third-field HLA allele typing following ONT sequencing.
resultsFrom a R10.3 flow cell batch of 31 samples of known HLA allele types, up to 10,000 ONT reads were aligned using BWA aligner to reference allele sequences from the IPD-IMGT/HLA database. For each gene, the top two hits to reference alleles at the third field were selected. Using our pipeline, we obtained the following percent concordance at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd field: HLA-A (98.4%, 98.4%, 98.4%), HLA-B (100%, 96.8%, 96.8%), HLA-C (100%, 98.4%, 98.4%), HLA-DPA1 (100%, 96.8%, 96.8%), HLA-DPB1 (100%, 100%, 98.4%), HLA-DQA1 (100%, 98.4%, 98.4%), HLA-DQB1 (100%, 98.4%, 98.4%), HLA-DRB1 (83.9%, 64.5%, 64.5%), HLA-DRB3 (82.6%, 73.9%, 73.9%), HLA-DRB4 (100%, 100%, 100%) and HLA-DRB5 (100%, 100%, 100%). By running our pipeline on an additional R10.3 flow cell batch of 63 samples, the following percent concordances were obtained:: HLA-A (100%, 96.8%, 88.1%), HLA-B (100%, 90.5.4%, 88.1%), HLA-C (100%, 99.2%, 99.2%), HLA-DPA1 (100%, 98.4%, 97.6%), HLA-DPB1 (98.4%, 97.6%, 92.9%), HLA-DQA1 (100%, 100%, 98.4%), HLA-DQB1 (100%, 97.6%, 96.0%), HLA-DRB1 (88.9%, 68.3%, 68.3%), HLA-DRB3 (81.0%, 61.9%, 61.9%), HLA-DRB4 (100%, 97.4%, 94.7%) and HLA-DRB5 (73.3%, 66.7%, 66.7%). In addition, our pipeline demonstrated significantly improved concordance compared to publicly available pipeline HLA-LA and concordances close to Athlon2 in commercial development.
conclusionOur algorithm had a > 96% concordance for non-HLA-DRB genes at 3rd field on the first batch and > 88% concordance for non-HLA-DRB genes at 3rd field and > 90% at 2nd field on the second batch tested. In addition, it out-performs HLA-LA and approaches the performance of the Athlon2. This lays groundwork for better utilizing Nanopore sequencing data for HLA typing especially in improving organ transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.