Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200140›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

High-throughput phenotyping of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) genotypes under water stress: exploring drought resistance for sustainable agriculture.

Michal Antala, Marek Kovar, Lucia Sporinová, Andrej Filacek, Radosław Juszczak, Marek Zivcak, Aida Shomali, Raghavendra Prasad, Marian Brestic, Anshu Rastogi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in mutant characterization for detecting causal mutations in crop plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michal AntalaLaboratory of Bioclimatology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Piątkowska 94, Poznań, 60-649, Poland.
Marek KovarDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, Nitra, 949 76, Slovak Republic.
Lucia SporinováDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, Nitra, 949 76, Slovak Republic.
Andrej FilacekDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, Nitra, 949 76, Slovak Republic.
Radosław JuszczakLaboratory of Bioclimatology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Piątkowska 94, Poznań, 60-649, Poland.
Marek ZivcakDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, Nitra, 949 76, Slovak Republic.
Aida ShomaliDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, Nitra, 949 76, Slovak Republic.
Raghavendra PrasadDepartment of Environmental Horticulture, Royal Horticultural Society, London, GU23 6QB, UK.
Marian BresticDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, Nitra, 949 76, Slovak Republic.
Anshu RastogiLaboratory of Bioclimatology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Piątkowska 94, Poznań, 60-649, Poland. anshu.rastogi@up.poznan.pl.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 23-04221 LHorizon 2020 Framework Programme 731013Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej BWS/BIL/2022/1/00120Narodowym Centrum Nauki 2021/43/I/NZ9/01356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs global agriculture faces the challenge of climate change, characterized by longer and more severe drought episodes, there is an increasing need for crop diversification and improved plant breeding. Buckwheat is one of the climate-resilient candidates for future important crops with remarkable adaptability to various biotic and abiotic stresses. As an underbred crop, a large number of genotypes should be assessed for the breeding of superior plants. Therefore, this study investigates the response of various buckwheat genotypes to water stress by high-throughput phenotyping and auxiliary plant physiology measurements.

resultsWe assessed six buckwheat genotypes from different regions under mild and severe water stress, focusing on morphological and physiological changes to understand drought tolerance mechanisms. Our findings revealed that reallocation of assimilated carbon from growth to secondary metabolite production is a common response to drought stress. Among the genotypes tested, Panda emerged as the most drought-resistant, with its morphology remaining the most stable under mild water stress and its ability to rapidly accumulate protective pigments in response to drought. Silver Hull also demonstrated resilience, maintaining its aboveground biomass under mild water stress at levels comparable to the control group. Additionally, the response magnitude to drought stress was linked to the biomass production potential of the genotypes, which was higher for those from warmer regions (Bhutan, Zimbabwe) and lower for those from colder regions (Poland, Canada).

conclusionThe diversity in genotypic responses highlights the significant role of genetic variability in shaping drought resistance strategies in buckwheat. This research not only enhances our understanding of buckwheat's physiological responses to water stress but also holds promise for developing drought-resistant buckwheat varieties. These advancements are crucial for promoting sustainable agriculture in the face of climate change.

Indexed as

DroughtsFagopyrumAgricultureCrops, AgriculturalDehydrationDrought ResistanceGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingStress, PhysiologicalAdaption strategiesCO2 assimilationDroughtGenetic diversityPhenotyping

Identifiers

PMID40200140
PMCPMC11978128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.