ArticleScientific reports2025
An artificial intelligence model for predicting an appropriate mAs with target exposure indicator for chest digital radiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning for optimizing mAs in KUB radiography with metal implants.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In digital radiography, image quality is synergistically affected by anatomy-specific examinations, exposure factors, body parameters, detector types, and vendors/systems. However, estimating appropriate exposure factors before radiography with optimized image quality without overexposure or underexposure to patients is difficult. Thus, there is an unmet need to establish a model to predict appropriate mAs for optimizing image quality before radiography. This study aimed to establish a machine learning (ML) model for predicting an appropriate current-time product (mAs) using the target exposure indicator in chest digital radiography. An anthropomorphic chest phantom was used to establish a target exposure indicator which was used to define overexposure and underexposure in the human study. This study enrolled 1,000 (M/F = 915/85) subjects who underwent regular chest radiography. The chest thickness, height, weight, body mass index, mAs, and concomitant reached exposure (REX) were recorded. To construct the prediction model, the dataset was randomly separated into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets by matching their demographic characteristics. Five ML models were trained using the training set with 10-fold cross validation, and the model performance was evaluated using the testing set with correlation coefficients, root-mean-square error, and mean average error. The phantom study showed that the average REX was 355.6 which served as the target exposure indicator. In human study, the comparisons showed that the artificial neural network (ANN) model was the most suitable for predicting both REX and mAs values. The results demonstrated that, on average, the predicted mAs values were 10% lower and 8% higher than the values determined by AEC in the overexposure (REX > 355.6) and underexposure (REX < 355.6) groups, respectively. Moreover, the predicted mAs values were further reduced in all patients when lowering the target REX values. We concluded that the ML approach was feasible for building an artificial intelligence model for predicting appropriate mAs with target exposure indicator for chest digital radiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.