ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of patients with decreased general condition and comparing HOTEL, WPS, and REMS for mortality prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of prognostic scoring tools for ICU triage and mortality among patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergency department (ED) plays a crucial role in evaluating patients with decreased general condition (DGC). Prompt diagnosis and precise risk stratification enhances clinical care outcomes. This study aimed to reveal which scoring system is better for predicting mortality in patients with DGC. This single-center prospective study was conducted between 1 March 2021 and 1 June 2021 in a tertiary university hospital's ED. All patients presented with DGC were included. The scores assessed upon ED admission for patients include the Hypotension, Oxygen saturation, low Temperature, ECG changes, and Loss of independence, abbreviated as HOTEL score, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), and the Worthing Physiological Scoring (WPS). The study aimed to compare the scoring systems to identify which is the best mortality predictor. Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality were analyzed using binary logistic regression and ROC curves to assess the effectiveness of HOTEL, REMS, and WPS scores in predicting mortality. The study was conducted with 137 DGC patients. The median age of patients presented to the ED with DGC was 77 (66.5-87), and 50.4% were male. 52.6% of patients died within one month. Analysis of mortality risk factors revealed that gender, age, day of admission, visit type, home oxygen, urinary catheter use, and speech status were not independent risk factors. For one-month mortality prediction, AUCs were: HOTEL 0.644 (cut-off 1), REMS 0.635 (cut-off 8), WPS 0.547 (cut-off 5). For mechanical ventilation: HOTEL 0.689 (10), REMS 0.790 (10), WPS 0.777 (4). For ICU admission: HOTEL 0.697 (2), REMS 0.770 (9), WPS 0.728 (4). Both the HOTEL and REMS scoring systems have moderate prognostic value in predicting mortality in patients with a DGC. The REMS, and WPS scores are also more helpful in determining the need for intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.