Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200105›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025

Rural-urban disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination: Findings from a cross-sectional survey of 13 southern US states, December 2019-January 2020.

Lavanya Vasudevan, Yunfei Wang, Jan Ostermann, Valerie Yelverton, Jingyi Yang, Laura J Fish, Sayward E Harrison, Charnetta Williams, Emmanuel B Walter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lavanya VasudevanHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-6070
Yunfei WangDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-6338
Jan OstermannDuke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-9500
Valerie YelvertonDepartment of Health Services Policy & Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9445-7022
Jingyi YangDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0972-4342
Laura J FishDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-3063
Sayward E HarrisonSouth Carolina Smart State Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-7640
Charnetta WilliamsImmunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emmanuel B WalterDuke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6502-6736

Funding

Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA)- T32T32AI007392 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amy Lynn Corneli, Guido Ferrari · 1990 to 2026
$9.8M
NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001095NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural adolescents in the United States lag behind their urban counterparts in the uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. However, a systematic assessment of factors associated with rural-urban disparities in HPV vaccination coverage to inform potential vaccination promotion interventions is lacking in the literature. Prioritizing HPV vaccination for rural adolescents is necessary for increasing overall HPV vaccination coverage for adolescents and for reducing the incidence of HPV infections and future HPV-related cancers.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of adolescents aged 9-17 years from 13 states located in the southern United States. Participants were recruited from a nationally representative online survey panel and self-administered the survey from December 2019 to January 2020. The survey assessed HPV vaccination initiation and series completion for rural and urban adolescents, and sought to systematically identify modifiable factors (eg, caregiver knowledge and attitudes about HPV/HPV vaccine, health care access) and nonmodifiable factors (eg, sociodemographic characteristics) that may be associated with rural-urban disparities in adolescent HPV vaccination. Rural versus urban residence status of respondents was determined using the US Census definition and Federal Information Processing System (FIPS) codes.

resultsAmong 2,262 sampled caregivers, data from 987 respondents (43.6%) were included in the analysis; 193 respondents (19.6%) were from rural areas and 794 (80.4%) were from urban areas. Overall, 333 (33.7%) adolescents had received at least 1 dose of HPV vaccination and 259 (26.3%) adolescents had completed HPV vaccination. In comparison to urban adolescents, fewer rural adolescents had initiated (-7.7 percentage points) or completed (-14.9 percentage points) HPV vaccination. Uptake of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal (MenACWY), and influenza vaccines was similar between urban and rural adolescents. Caregiver attitudes, but not their knowledge about HPV infection or the HPV vaccine, were associated with disparities in HPV vaccination initiation. Rural caregivers were more likely to report concerns with the HPV vaccine, lower access to a pediatric primary care provider, longer travel times to reach health care providers, and HPV vaccination at age 11 years or older compared with age 9 or 10 years. When compared with urban caregivers, fewer rural caregivers reported discussing HPV vaccination with their adolescent's provider although difference in the receipt of a provider recommendation was not statistically significant between rural and urban adolescents.

conclusionsOur findings confirm rural-urban disparities in HPV vaccination coverage for adolescents living in the 13 southern US states. Future research efforts to reduce rural-urban disparities in HPV vaccination should evaluate the impacts of interventions that increase positive caregiver attitudes about HPV vaccination, expand access to vaccination services and pediatricians for rural adolescents, enable strong provider recommendations, and increase the window of HPV vaccination by promoting vaccination initiation at younger ages (9-10 years). While this analysis focused on rural-urban disparities, lower rates of HPV vaccination overall suggest that interventions in rural areas be implemented alongside broader efforts to promote adolescent HPV vaccination coverage in the southern United States.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesPapillomavirus VaccinesRural PopulationUrban PopulationVaccinationAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsSurveys and QuestionnairesPapillomavirus Vaccinesadolescentshealth disparityhuman papillomavirusrural healthSouthern United Statesvaccination

Identifiers

PMID40200105
PMCPMC12168015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.