ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying a unique chromosomal pattern to predict the gemcitabine response in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an epithelial bile duct cancer frequently found at an advanced stage, leading to poor response to current therapies. Although gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CIS) are the current gold-standard for treating unresectable CCA, GEM resistance often occurs. To predict the response to GEM, we evaluated chromosomal aberrations using a chromosome microarray, and their association with GEM response by histoculture drug response assay. Our findings revealed principal component analysis and orthogonal partial-least square discriminant analysis cross validated score plot between response and non-response groups were different. Different signature patterns of chromosomes between response and non-response groups analyzed by heatmap analysis identified 34 regions of 15 chromosomes. An increased signal in responders and a decreased signal in non-responders were found in regions 4q32.1, 5q12.3, 10q21.3, 11p11.2, 11q14.2, 16p11.2, 17q22, 21q21.3 and 22q12.3. In contrast, a high signal in non-responders and low signal in responders were seen in regions 2q37.2, 11q14.1, 16q22.3 and 16q23.3. High signal of CDH13 and TENM4 were demonstrated in GEM non-response, while a high CWC27 signal was noted in GEM response. This signature pattern could provide the knowledge to improve a predictive biomarker for GEM response, benefitting for individual CCA patient management and chemotherapeutic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.