ArticleScientific reports2025
Psychometric properties and longitudinal measurement invariance of the treatment-induced neuropathy assessment scale in the Chinese cancer chemotherapy population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation and cutpoints of the treatment-induced neuropathy assessment scale (TNAS) in Chinese cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy is one of the most complex toxicities to diagnose and manage in cancer patients. The severity and course of neuropathy across various cancer treatments are widely assessed using the Treatment-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale (TNAS). However, the psychometric properties and longitudinal measurement invariance of TNAS have not been evaluated in non-Western samples. The purpose of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties and longitudinal measurement invariance of the TNAS in Chinese cancer patients. A quantitative survey with a longitudinal design was used in this study. A total of 361 patients were included and data were collected at three-time points. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent validity, longitudinal measurement invariance, criterion validity, and internal consistency reliability were evaluated. In this study, CFA supported the 2-factor structure of the original TNAS construct at three time points. The composite reliability (CR) and the average variance extracted (AVE) indicated that the TNAS had good convergent validity. Furthermore, TNAS exhibited strong measurement invariance over time with good reliability across different time points. The correlation between TNAS and EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 showed good criterion validity. Moreover, the TNAS and sub-scales had high internal consistency at three time points. Thus, TNAS is a reliable and valid instrument with adequate psychometric properties and temporal stability for measuring treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy and tracking changes in neuropathy symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.