ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of the results of 13 combined pathogen detection in 3966 hospitalised children with acute lower respiratory tract infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Epidemiological characteristics and clinical correlations of human metapneumovirus (HMPV) infection in children aged 0-14 years in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- The prevalence and role of human respiratory syncytial virus in pediatric respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global data.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and macrolide resistance analysis of pertussis in children: a retrospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multi-dimensional epidemiology of pediatric acute respiratory tract infection in Ningbo, China (2020-2024): age-specific susceptibility, pathogen dynamics, and epidemiological trends.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- tNGS-based detection of respiratory pathogens in a single center: associations with age, gender, season, and co-infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate identification of infectious pathogens can facilitate appropriate drug use and reduce both the duration and financial burden associated with hospital stays. This study aimed to provide reference for the clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of acute lower respiratory tract infections in Xiamen, China, by investigating the distribution and characteristics of common viruses or atypical pathogens that cause acute lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalised paediatric patients. Data from 3966 paediatric patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections and 13 respiratory pathogens detected from December 2021 to November 2023 were retrospectively collected. The sex, age, and infectious pathogens were statistically analysed. The total detection rate of 13 combined pathogens in the 3966 hospitalised children with acute lower respiratory tract infections was 86.13%. The top five pathogens were Human rhinovirus, Human respiratory syncytial virus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Human parainfluenza virus, and Metapneumovirus. The lowest infection numbers were reported in the first 2 months after coronavirus containment measures were lifted. Significant differences were observed in the infection rates of most pathogens across different age groups. Influenza virus A, B, Metapneumovirus, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections showed clear periodicity. Mixed infections were common, and most pathogenic infections exhibited age-related trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.