ArticleScientific reports2025
Molecule subtypes play important roles for second primary malignancies development based on 324,661 breast cancer survivors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence trend of breast molecule subtypes was unclear. There was not quantified risk by subtype with the second primary malignancies (SPMs) and limited evidence about the risk factors for developing SPMs in first primary breast cancer(FPBC). Data from 18 SEER registries were used to identify FPBC, which were randomly selected for training and validation sets. The SPMs information of breast cancer survivors in Hebei were also collected to compare the distribution with SEER. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to explore the risk factors and integrated to the establishment of nomogram and risk stratification model. There was a decreased trend for TNBC, but an increased trend for Luminal A. The median survival months were 46, 46, 46 and 44 for Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 enriched and TNBC, with the median latency time were 39, 39, 40 and 41.0 months, respecitvely, The cumulative incidence rates(CIR) of SPMs were 2.61%, 2.30%, 2.21% and 2.84%. Age at diagnosis, clinical lymph node status, radiotherapy and subtypes were independent risk factors for SPMs. A predict nomogram was established with the AUC of 0.682 and 0.679 for three- and five- year incidence risk in training set. Patients were divided into the low-risk (31.94%), intermediate-risk (51.83%) and high-risk (16.23%) groups by risk stratification model. The first common SPMs was second breast cancer in both SEER and Hebei cohort, the second and third rank SPMs were lung and gynecological cancer in SEER, but presented the opposite result in Hebei. The incidence rates and SPMs of subtypes were difference. The high risk individuals could be identified by risk stratification model, who need more closely followed up by Clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.