ArticleScientific reports2025
Transcriptomics-driven exploration of genetic variation and peptide discovery in the sea anemones Anthopleura midori and Actinia equina.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cnidarian Venoms in the Omics Era: Toxin Discovery and Bioactive Potential.Marine drugs · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exploring sea anemone polypeptides enables us to understand the evolutionary history and ecological adaptation strategies of species at the microscopic level. More importantly, it aims to provide a solid theoretical foundation for drug development and biodiversity conservation research. Through systematic research, we discovered a total of 51 toxin sequences in species Anthopleura midori and Acyinia equina. The toxin sequences between the two species exhibited significant differences, with notable diversity observed among individuals. In terms of genetic diversity, species Anthopleura midori primarily exhibits variations due to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), whereas species Actinia equina shows frequent insertion and deletion events. In transcription factor analysis, both species Anthopleura midori and Actinia equina share common transcription factors TEA (TEA Domain Transcription Factor), SPL(Squamosa Promoter Binding Protein-like), and bHLH (Basic Helix-Loop-Helix). Notably. Notably, bHLH is highly expressed in Actinia equina, which may give it advantages in muscle and nervous system development. On the other hand, Anthopleura midori may rely on other transcription factors. Furthermore, by employing transcriptomics and mass spectrometry techniques, two new gene families were successfully identified, and five structurally novel cyclic peptides were predicted. Kinetic simulations further confirmed that the peptide segment B3a-c29555_c4_g4 binds primarily through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions with the Cav3.1 (PDB ID:6 KZO) protein, and this peptide has the potential to act as a channel modulator for Cav3.1. Overall, this research not only deepens our understanding of the genetic basis of toxin diversity but also highlights the great potential of these toxins in the development of novel drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.