ArticleScientific reports2025
Deciphering the impact of sepsis phenotypes on improving clinical outcome predictions: a multicenter retrospective analysis based on critical care in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence- and Machine Learning-Assisted Subphenotyping for Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Deriving consensus sepsis clusters via goal-directed subgroup identification in multi-omics study.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a clinically heterogeneous disease with high mortality. It is crucial to develop relevant therapeutic strategies for different sepsis phenotypes, but the impact of phenotypes on patients' clinical outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to identify potential sepsis phenotypes using readily available clinical parameters and assess their predictive value for 28-day clinical outcomes by logistic regression analysis. In this retrospective analysis, researchers extracted clinical data from adult patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between April and August 2022 and from the 2014-2015 eICU Collaborative Study database. K-Means clustering was utilized to identify and refine sepsis phenotypes, and their predictive performance was subsequently evaluated. Logistic regression models were trained independently for each phenotype and five-fold cross-validation was used to predict clinical outcomes. Predictive accuracy was then compared to traditional non-clustered prediction methods using model assessment scores. The study cohort consisted of 250 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, allocated in a 7:3 ratio for training and testing, respectively, and an external validation cohort of 3100 patients from the eICU Cooperative Research Database. The results of the phenotype-based prediction model demonstrated an improvement in F1 score from 0.74 to 0.82 and AUC from 0.74(95%CI 0.71-0.80) to 0.84(95%CI 0.82-0.87), and these results also highlight the superiority of clinical outcome prediction with the help of sepsis phenotypes over traditional prediction methods. Phenotype-based prediction of 28-day clinical outcomes in sepsis demonstrated significant advantages over traditional models, highlighting the impact of phenotype-driven modeling on clinical outcomes in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.