ArticleScientific reports2025
The influence of information processing speed on memory processes in patients with relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognition in multiple sclerosis within the modern diagnostic and treatment era.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Clinical, Cognitive and Demographic Determinants of Work Participation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Slowed information processing speed (IPS) is the primary cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although it is known to affect memory processes, the relationships between verbal learning (VL), verbal memory (VM) and IPS in different phenotypes of multiple sclerosis (MS) remain underexplored. This bicentric study aimed to investigate in detail IPS, VL, and VM as well as the relationships between these cognitive domains in a large sample of 92 pwMS (61 with early relapsing-remitting MS (pwRRMS), 31 with primary-progressive MS (pwPPMS)) and 61 age-matched healthy controls (HC). Compared with HC, pwPPMS performed significantly worse on all cognitive measures, whereas pwRRMS performed worse than HC only on IPS and VL. Irrespective of phenotype, IPS impairment emerged as the core cognitive deficit in MS, affecting 25% of the RRMS group and 45% of the PPMS group. PwRRMS outperformed pwPPMS in all domains, with the most pronounced differences observed in VL. Isolated VL or VM impairments were rare, as most pwMS with these deficits also had concurrent IPS impairment. PwPPMS had significantly higher rates of IPS and VL impairment than pwRRMS, but not in VM. Regression analyses showed that IPS significantly predicted both VL and VM performance in both MS groups. In HC, IPS was only associated with VL performance, hinting at different cognitive mechanisms underlying the performance in this domain. This study provides evidence that pwPPMS experience more pronounced cognitive changes in IPS and VL compared to pwRRMS. It also highlights the pervasive impact of IPS on VL and VM performance in both subtypes, underscoring the importance of IPS-focused interventions in the management of MS-related cognitive dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.