ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of four weeks of repeated sprint training with blood flow restriction on upper limb microcirculation in boxers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Can blood flow restriction amplify the physiological and performance benefits of interval training in male intermittent-sport athletes? a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of sprint interval cycling with blood flow restriction on capillary blood lactate, cognitive function and perceptual response: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of 4 weeks of 40% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with repeated sprint training (RST) on the microcirculation function of upper limbs in boxers and investigates the potential mechanisms underlying improvements in microcirculation from the perspective of blood factor changes. Thirty-six healthy male collegiate boxers were assigned to either a blood flow restriction training group (Experimental Group, EG, n = 18) or a conventional training group (Control Group, CG, n = 18), completing 12 sessions over 4 weeks (three sessions per week). The training regimen for EG and CG was identical, except EG underwent BFR during the training sessions. Measurements of arm circumference, muscle strength, microcirculation function (4 indicators), and blood factor (4 indicators) were taken one day before training began and the day after the final training session. Using two-factor repeated measures ANOVA, significant differences were observed in EG's arm circumference at tension, muscle strength, microvascular blood flow perfusion, transcutaneous oxygen pressure, muscle oxygen saturation, nitric oxide levels, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, endothelin-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor, all showing improvements from baseline. In contrast, CG only demonstrated increased upper limb strength, with no significant changes in the other indicators. These findings suggest that while both training protocols may enhance muscle strength, the addition of BFR notably improves upper limb microcirculation and muscle strength in collegiate boxers by modulating the secretion of blood factors such as endothelial nitric oxide synthase, endothelin-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.