Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199937›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neurophysiological evidence for emotional attention modulation depending on goal relevance.

Xiaojuan Xue, Gilles Pourtois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaojuan XueCognitive & Affective Psychophysiology Laboratory, Department of Experimental Clinical & Health Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Xiaojuan.Xue@UGent.be.
Gilles PourtoisCognitive & Affective Psychophysiology Laboratory, Department of Experimental Clinical & Health Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although threat-related stimuli can capture attention automatically, recent findings have challenged this assumption by showing that goal rather than threat can be prioritized and eventually guide attentional control. In this study, we used high density electroencephalography (EEG) in 40 participants while peripheral emotional faces (either fear or happiness) were either goal-relevant or irrelevant during a dot-probe task (DPT). The use of peripheral vision was established by eye-tracking. Both the face specific N170 component and the subsequent Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) were enhanced by fear at the cue level, yet the latter one only when fear was goal relevant. Importantly, we found that early on following target onset at the P1 level, both value and goal relevance drove spatial attention and interacted with each other such that when they were goal-relevant, fearful faces captured attention less than when they were not. These results suggest that emotional attention is flexible and it can be influenced by the goal relevance of emotion. Moreover, they shed light on the electrophysiological manifestations of this flexibility and dovetail with the assumption that sensory gain control effects occurring in the visual cortex depending on attentional control are multiplexed and determined by both value and goal.

Indexed as

AttentionEmotionsGoalsAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFacial ExpressionFearFemaleHappinessHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultAutomaticityEPNFearGoal relevanceN170P1pc

Identifiers

PMID40199937
PMCPMC11978912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.