ArticleScientific reports2025
A causal effects of neutrophil extracellular traps and its biomarkers on acute respiratory distress syndrome: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The U-shaped correlation between the systemic immune-inflammation index and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hyperlipidemic patients: findings from NHANES 1999-2018.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- MicroRNA-223/NE Signaling Pathway Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Regulating Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have indicated an association between neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study aimed to investigate the potential causal effects of NETs and NETs-related biomarkers on ARDS or vice-versa. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) utilizing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data was employed to analyze the causality. The primary analysis was conducted using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) methods; weighted median, MR-Egger, and weighted model methods were used to validate the results. Horizontal pleiotropy and outlier detection were assessed via MR-Egger and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), respectively; Cochran's Q test evaluated heterogeneity, while Leave-one-out analyses were used to evaluate the presence of predominant instrumental variables (IVs). IVW method suggested causal associations between genetically predicted IL-13 and a higher risk of ARDS [OR (95%CI) = 1.52 (1.03-2.23), P = 0.047], while there was no causal effect of other factors on ARDS (all P > 0.05). Also, ARDS had no effect on NETs and NETs-related biomarkers (all P > 0.05). Cochran's Q confirmed no significant heterogeneity. MR-Egger regression ruled out horizontal pleiotropy's influence, and MR-PRESSO analysis identified no outliers, reinforcing the study's findings. This MR study established a causal relationship between IL-13 and ARDS, suggesting its potential role as a therapeutic target and biomarker of ARDS. Future work should delve into the underlying mechanisms and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.