Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199905›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Design, Dynamics and Development of Upgraded Tiltable Wing associated Quadcopter through Advanced computational simulations incorporated Bottom-Up Approach.

Haribalan Saravana Mohan, Karthikeyan Murugaraj, Senthil Kumar Solaiappan, Beena Stanislaus Arputharaj, Parvathy Rajendran, It Ee Lee, Shyam Sundar Jayakumar, Janani Priyadharshini Veeraperumal Senthil Nathan, Arunkumar Karuppasamy, Vijayanandh Raja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haribalan Saravana MohanDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Karthikeyan MurugarajDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Senthil Kumar SolaiappanDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Beena Stanislaus ArputharajDepartment of Research and Innovation, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India.
Parvathy RajendranSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia. aeparvathy@usm.my.
It Ee LeeFaculty of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering (FAIE), Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, 63100, Cyberjaya, Selangor D. E, Malaysia. ielee@mmu.edu.my.
Shyam Sundar JayakumarDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Janani Priyadharshini Veeraperumal Senthil NathanDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arunkumar KaruppasamyDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Vijayanandh RajaDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims to design a hybrid quadcopter that can be used for multiple detecting applications in which its performance parameters are studied under various maneuverings such as forward and vertical movements based on computational studies. In order to enhance the endurance, the conventional rectangular cross-sectional arm was replaced by airfoil cross sectional arm which helps in reduction of overall drag. The proposed idea is a combination of both tilt wing and tilt rotor configurations to the hybrid unmanned aerial vehicle (HUAV). The CAD modeling of UAV components such as wing and propeller is done using Autodesk Fusion 360 and the fluid flow analysis is carried out using ANSYS Workbench 23 software. Different test cases including the Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), Fluid structure interaction (FSI) analysis are executed to estimate the performance of the configuration. Analyzing from a stability point of view, a mathematical model was designed for control of altitude increment, hold and forward velocity accordingly, and tuning of the controller was taken over. This UAV is capable of attaining stability during harsh environments which is analyzed using control dynamics study and controller design processes executed. As a preliminary work for validation, grid convergence study is performed to obtain reliable outcome for the computational study taken over, in addition to the execution of analytical validation for estimation of aerodynamic forces and deflection of wing due to impingement of drag force over frontal area of wing and experimental validations to determine the thrust produced by propeller. The steady fluid flow analysis is carried over for wing planform and transient flow analysis is done for both vertical and forward propellers using advanced CFD techniques. Based on the FSI approach, structural analysis was carried over for wing and propeller through which the material selection was done. From which, GY-70-CFRP composite was concluded as the best performing material by analyzing the performance parameters including total deformation etc., among various different imposed materials based on aerodynamical loading. Interpreting from the performed analyses, the proposed configuration seems to operate at less power considering the lift forces induced, which also enables it to reach better altitudes at less RPM. The structural efficiency happens to be achieved due to the reduction in the RPM as there is a contribution in lift production as the angle of attack of the proposed wing increases, which also decreases rotors' burden during forward motion and other maneuverings.

Indexed as

Endurance enhancementEnergy conservationHybrid lift generationSurveillanceSustainabilityTilt wing

Identifiers

PMID40199905
PMCPMC11978954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.