ArticleScientific reports2025
Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and lymphocyte to neutrophil ratio in neurosyphilis may affect the response to therapy and diagnostic efficacy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic predictors in HIV-negative neurosyphilis: a retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the effects of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), lymphocyte to neutrophil ratio (LNR), and serum toluidine red unheated serum test (sero-TRUST) titers on the therapy response of HIV negative neurosyphilis (NS) patients after initial therapy. HIV negative NS patients who received initial therapy at the Second Hospital of Nanjing were selected as the research participants, and demographic data, as well as clinical and laboratory data, were collected through follow-up.Group the study population based on response to therapy status, with complete response to therapy as the endpoint of the study. Cox regression analysis of factors influencing response to therapy after initial therapy. Time-dependent ROC curve evaluation of LMR and LNR prediction ability. Among the 249 patients included in this study, 200 were in the response to therapy group and 49 were in the therapy non-response to therapy group. Cox regression analysis found that baseline blood LMR > 1.93, LNR > 0.3, and sero-TRUST titer > 1:16 can affect the response to therapy outcomes. However, there was no statistically significant difference between LMR and LNR with and without response in the therapy group. The time-dependent ROC curve shows that the AUC for evaluating response to therapy is moderately sensitive based on baseline sero-TRUST titers, or LNR after 3 months of therapy, sero-TRUST difference from baseline. Baseline blood LMR > 1.93 and sero-TRUST titers ≥ 1:16 may be important prognostic factors affecting response to therapy in HIV negative NS patients. Baseline sero-TRUST titer > 1:16, LNR increase > 0.12 or sero-TRUST titer decrease > 2-fold after 3 months of therapy can be used as auxiliary indicators to evaluate the occurrence of therapy response in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.