ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
The perception of temporal order can be influenced by retrospective stimulation.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence against independence of peripheral latencies and central threshold in temporal-order perception.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When judging the order of presentation of the two visual stimuli (targets), if a preceding cue was presented around one of the targets, the target on the cue side was judged to have been given first (the pre-cue effect). In Experiment 1, a cue was presented after the target. As a result, it was found that the target on the cue side was judged to be presented later (post-cue effect). Experiment 2 confirmed the replicability of the post-cue effect by manipulating target-target onset asynchrony. Experiment 3 showed a post-cue effect in simultaneity judgments, demonstrating the robustness of this effect. The post-cue effect demonstrates that the process of judging temporal order or simultaneity is sensitive to stimulation shortly after the task-relevant stimuli, and may suggest that this process relates to the detection of movement direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40199837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.