Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199834›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Enhancing Burn Diagnosis through SE-ResNet18 and Confidence Filtering.

Hanyue Mo, Ziwen Kuang, Haoxuan Wang, Xinyi Cai, Kun Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanyue MoZhejiang-New Zealand Joint Vision-Based Intelligent Metrology Laboratory, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, No. 258 Xueyuan Street, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China.
Ziwen KuangZhejiang-New Zealand Joint Vision-Based Intelligent Metrology Laboratory, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, No. 258 Xueyuan Street, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China.
Haoxuan WangZhejiang-New Zealand Joint Vision-Based Intelligent Metrology Laboratory, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, No. 258 Xueyuan Street, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China.
Xinyi CaiCollege of Life Sciences, China Jiliang University, No. 258 Xueyuan Street, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China.
Kun ChengZhejiang-New Zealand Joint Vision-Based Intelligent Metrology Laboratory, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, No. 258 Xueyuan Street, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China. chengkun@ustc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-097X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of burn severity is crucial for effective clinical treatment; however, existing methods often fail to balance precision and real-time performance. To address this challenge, we propose a deep learning-based approach utilizing an enhanced ResNet18 architecture with integrated attention mechanisms to improve classification accuracy. The system consists of data preprocessing, classification, optimization, and post-processing modules. The optimization strategy employs an adaptive learning rate combining cosine annealing and class-specific gradient adaptation, alongside targeted adjustments for class imbalance, while an improved Adam optimizer enhances convergence stability. Post-processing incorporates confidence filtering (threshold 0.3) and selective evaluation, with weighted aggregation-integrating dynamic accuracy calculation and moving average to refine predictions and enhance diagnostic reliability. Experimental results on a burn skin test dataset demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a classification accuracy of 99.19% ± 0.12 and a mean average precision (mAP) of 98.72% ± 0.10, highlighting its potential for real-time clinical burn assessment.

Indexed as

BurnsDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsBurn severity classificationConfidence filteringDynamic learning rateMedical imagingResidual network 18Squeeze-and-excitation

Identifiers

PMID40199834
PMCPMC12920881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.