ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Enhancing Burn Diagnosis through SE-ResNet18 and Confidence Filtering.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliable Detection, Unreliable Clinical Decision-making: Artificial Intelligence Models in Burn Assessment.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate classification of burn severity is crucial for effective clinical treatment; however, existing methods often fail to balance precision and real-time performance. To address this challenge, we propose a deep learning-based approach utilizing an enhanced ResNet18 architecture with integrated attention mechanisms to improve classification accuracy. The system consists of data preprocessing, classification, optimization, and post-processing modules. The optimization strategy employs an adaptive learning rate combining cosine annealing and class-specific gradient adaptation, alongside targeted adjustments for class imbalance, while an improved Adam optimizer enhances convergence stability. Post-processing incorporates confidence filtering (threshold 0.3) and selective evaluation, with weighted aggregation-integrating dynamic accuracy calculation and moving average to refine predictions and enhance diagnostic reliability. Experimental results on a burn skin test dataset demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a classification accuracy of 99.19% ± 0.12 and a mean average precision (mAP) of 98.72% ± 0.10, highlighting its potential for real-time clinical burn assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.