Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199833›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

How Do Radiologists Currently Monitor AI in Radiology and What Challenges Do They Face? An Interview Study and Qualitative Analysis.

Jamie Chow, Ryan Lee, Honghan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamie ChowInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK. Jamie.chow@doctors.org.uk.
Ryan LeeSidney Kimmel Medical College at Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Honghan WuInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK. honghan.wu@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-5668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology is becoming increasingly prevalent; however, there is not a clear picture of how AI is being monitored today and how this should practically be done given the inherent risk of AI model performance degradation over time. This research investigates current practices and what difficulties radiologists face in monitoring AI. Semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted with 6 USA and 10 Europe-based radiologists. The interviews were automatically transcribed and underwent thematic analysis. The findings suggest that AI monitoring in radiology is still relatively nascent as most of the AI projects had not yet progressed into a fully live clinical deployment. The most common method of monitoring involved a manual process of retrospectively comparing the AI results against the radiology report. Automated and statistical methods of monitoring were much less common. The biggest challenges are a lack of resources to support AI monitoring and uncertainty about how to create a robust and scalable process of monitoring the breadth and variety of radiology AI applications available. There is currently a lack of practical guidelines on how to monitor AI which has led to a variety of approaches being proposed from both healthcare providers and vendors. An ensemble of mixed methods is recommended to monitor AI across multiple domains and metrics. This will be enabled by appropriate allocation of resources and the formation of robust and diverse multidisciplinary AI governance groups.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologistsRadiologyEuropeHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchUnited StatesArtificial intelligenceAuditMonitoringQuality assuranceRadiologistSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID40199833
PMCPMC12920929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.