Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199819›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Gradient matching accelerates mixed-effects inference for biochemical networks.

Yulan B van Oppen, Andreas Milias-Argeitis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yulan B van OppenGroningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-2907
Andreas Milias-ArgeitisGroningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-4228

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 016.Vidi.189.116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSingle-cell time series data often exhibit significant variability within an isogenic cell population. When modeling intracellular processes, it is therefore more appropriate to infer parameter distributions that reflect this variability, rather than fitting the population average to obtain a single point estimate. The Global Two-Stage (GTS) approach for nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) models is a simple and modular method commonly used for this purpose. However, this method is computationally intensive due to its repeated use of nonconvex optimization and numerical integration of the underlying system.

resultsWe propose the Gradient Matching GTS (GMGTS) method as an efficient alternative to GTS. Gradient matching offers an integration-free approach to parameter estimation that is particularly powerful for systems that are linear in the unknown parameters, such as biochemical networks modeled by mass action kinetics. By incorporating gradient matching into the GTS framework, we expand its capabilities through uncertainty propagation calculations and an iterative estimation scheme for partially observed systems. Comparisons between GMGTS and GTS across various inference setups show that our method significantly reduces computational demands, facilitating the application of complex NLME models in systems biology. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A Matlab implementation of GMGTS is provided at https://github.com/yulanvanoppen/GMGTS (DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14884457).

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalSystems BiologyAlgorithmsSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID40199819
PMCPMC12034378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.