ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Stress distribution on the components of multi-unit abutment with different angulation under lateral force: a finite element analysis.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFew studies have provided a detailed analysis of stress distribution on the components of multi-unit abutment (MUA)-implants complex, particularly the abutment screw and prosthetic screw, which are among the most fragile parts of the restoration. Our objective was to investigate the differences of stress distribution on the components of MUA-implants complex under varies loading conditions using finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe constructed MUA-implant complexes with different abutment angulations (0°, 17°, and 30°). A static force of 200 N was applied along the axis of the prosthetic abutment, accompanied by varying lateral forces (0 N, 30 N, and 100 N).
resultsWhen subjected to a 200 N axial load, implants with a 30° angulated abutment experienced nearly 2.5 times the stress (1185 MPa) compared to straight abutments (437 MPa). The maximum stress of the straight MUA-implant was 8 times higher under a 100 N lateral force (2389 MPa) compared to that without lateral force. Prosthetic screws suffered higher stress concentration than the abutment screw and stress was mostly located near the first thread of the prosthetic screw.
conclusionsThere is a distinct stress distribution pattern between the prosthetic screw and abutment screw, with the former experiencing higher stress concentration than the latter. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study indicates that prosthetic screws are more vulnerable to mechanical complications and cautions should be raised to balance biting force to minimize the risks of mechanical complications in patients with angulated MUA-implants complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40199778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.