Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199750›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Clinical considerations for non-operative treatment of spinal metastases with intermediate instability.

Atsushi Tanaka, Masanori Okamoto, Munehisa Kito, Keiichiro Koiwai, Yoshinori Tsukahara, Hiroki Oba, Keiji Matsumori, Hirokazu Ideta, Kaoru Aoki, Akira Takazawa and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Atsushi TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan. tanaatsu@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Masanori OkamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan. ryouyuma@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Munehisa KitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Keiichiro KoiwaiDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Yoshinori TsukaharaDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Hiroki ObaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Keiji MatsumoriDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Hirokazu IdetaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Kaoru AokiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Akira TakazawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Yasunari FujinagaDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Hiroshi HoriuchiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Jun TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the characteristics of spinal adverse events after non-operative treatment for spinal metastases with intermediate instability and to discuss clinical considerations when selecting non-operative treatment.

methodsThis study included 56 patients with spinal metastases who had Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores (SINS) of 7-12 and who underwent radiotherapy and intensive rehabilitation without a bed rest period as initial treatment between 2020 and 2023. We evaluated progression of paralysis and changes in spinal alignment before treatment, within 1 month, 1 to 6 months, and more than 6 months after treatment.

resultsParalysis progressed within 1 month after treatment in 7 of 56 patients (12.5%). Pre-treatment paralysis and SINS ≥ 11 were significantly associated with progression of paralysis. Alignment changes occurred in 18 of 56 patients (32.1%), with a similar incidence in patients with SINS ≥ 11 and ≤ 10. Fifteen of 44 patients (34.1%) without pre-treatment paralysis had alignment changes, but 1 patient (2.3%) experienced progression of paralysis due to increased instability within 1 month. All 3 patients whose paralysis progressed despite no evidence of malignant spinal cord compression before or after treatment had SINS ≥ 11 and showed vertebral height reduction and kyphosis progression within 1 month.

conclusionPatients with pre-treatment paralysis and SINS ≥ 11 can progress to paralysis early; therefore, careful observation and imaging examinations are recommended early after treatment. If spinal alignment worsens, the treatment plan should be reconsidered, including restrictions of activity and surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityParalysisSpinal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord CompressionIntermediate instabilityRadiotherapyRehabilitationSpinal metastases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.