Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199731›Full record

ReviewFunction (Oxford, England)2025

A Hands-On Introduction to Data Analytics for Biomedical Research.

Joshua Pickard, Victoria E Sturgess, Katherine O McDonald, Nicholas Rossiter, Kelly B Arnold, Yatrik M Shah, Indika Rajapakse, Daniel A Beard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Function (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua PickardDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Victoria E SturgessDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Katherine O McDonaldDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Nicholas RossiterCellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Kelly B ArnoldDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Yatrik M ShahDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Indika RajapakseDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Daniel A BeardDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0974-2353

Funding

Cellular and Molecular Biology at MichiganT32GM145470 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI John Chadwick Brenner · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
Systems and Integrative Biology Training ProgramT32GM150581 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DANIEL A BEARD · 2023 to 2026
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145470NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM150581NIH HHS T32GM150581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are having increasing impacts in the biomedical sciences. Modern AI tools enable uncovering hidden patterns in large datasets, forecasting outcomes, and numerous other applications. Despite the availability and power of these tools, the rapid expansion and complexity of AI applications can be daunting, and there is a conspicuous absence of consensus on their ethical and responsible use. Misapplication of AI can result in invalid, unclear, or biased outcomes, exacerbated by the unfamiliarity of many biomedical researchers with the underlying mathematical and computational principles. To address these challenges, this review and tutorial paper aims to achieve three primary objectives: (1) highlight prevalent data science applications in biomedical research, including data visualization, dimensionality reduction, missing data imputation, and predictive model training and evaluation; (2) provide comprehensible explanations of the mathematical foundations underpinning these methodologies; and (3) guide readers on the effective use and interpretation of software tools for implementing these methods in biomedical contexts. While introductory, this guide covers core principles essential for understanding advanced applications, empowering readers to critically interpret results, assess tools, and explore the potential and limitations of machine learning in their research. Ultimately, this paper serves as a practical foundation for biomedical researchers to confidently navigate the growing intersection of AI and biomedicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomedical ResearchData ScienceData AnalyticsHumansMachine Learningartificial intelligencedata sciencemachine learningtutorial

Identifiers

PMID40199731
PMCPMC11999024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.