Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199612›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate urinary catheterisation on a clinical teaching unit.

Catherine M Andary, Meera Shah, Shijie Zhou, Rishi Sharma, Azim Gangji, Seychelle Yohanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine M AndaryMcMaster University Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada catherine.andary@medportal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1124-9766
Meera ShahNephrology, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shijie ZhouCardiology, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rishi SharmaAnesthesiology, McMaster University Department of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Azim GangjiNephrology, McMaster University Department of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Seychelle YohannaNephrology, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indwelling urinary catheters are often inserted and retained without appropriate indications in the inpatient setting, leading to catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Previous multidisciplinary toolkits have created modest reductions in inappropriate catheterisation, but these effects were not sustained. This study aimed to achieve a 50% reduction in catheter-days and CAUTIs per 100 patient-days in a general medicine ward at a Canadian tertiary care hospital.A preintervention evaluation of urinary catheterisation was completed by retrospective chart review from 2020 to 2022. A quality improvement initiative was then conducted using an interrupted time series design. Patients admitted during the study period to general internal medicine on the pilot ward with an indwelling urinary catheter were included.A physician-targeted intervention in the electronic medical record system triggered reminders for patients with catheters inserted for more than 24 hours. The second intervention implemented standardised discussion of catheterised patients in daily multidisciplinary rounds. Finally, a chronic catheter order was created for patients with chronic indwelling catheters.Our outcome measures were the number of catheter-days and CAUTIs per 100 patient-days. Process measures were the utilisation of electronic reminder features and implementation of catheter review during multidisciplinary rounds. The balancing measure was the frequency of urinary catheter reinsertion following a failed trial of void.Catheter-days per 100 patient-days decreased from 14.2 to 5.8 days postintervention. CAUTIs decreased from 0.47 to 0.31 CAUTI per 100 patient-days. On average, 80% of patients with catheters were reviewed monthly during multidisciplinary rounds. 24 patients required catheter reinsertion postintervention due to a failed trial of void.The implementation of a multifaceted approach on a general medicine ward consisting of physician reminders, standardised discussion of catheters in multidisciplinary rounds and chronic catheter orders was associated with a sustained reduction in catheter use and CAUTIs.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementUrinary CatheterizationAgedCanadaCatheter-Related InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUrinary Tract InfectionsInfection controlInterrupted Time Series AnalysisPDSAQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40199612
PMCPMC11979598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.