ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2025
Exploring physiotherapist's ability to identify cauda equina syndrome early.
Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the ability of physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia to identify cauda equina syndrome (CES) in a timely manner, and to identify the methods used by physiotherapists to manage patients with suspected CES.
methodsThis study utilized a cross-sectional research design and was conducted in the period May-October 2023. It included licensed physiotherapists working in Saudi Arabia. The data was collected using a survey that aimed to assess physiotherapists' ability to identify CES early, using 12 statements. Based on the participants response to these statements, all responders were categorized into the following groups based on their ability to identify and manage CES early: proficient (10-12 points); good ability (7-9); fair ability (5-6); and poor ability (<=4). Consensus to a statement was reached when more than 70% of participants agreed or disagreed with the statement.
resultsThis study included 401 physiotherapists (mean age=29.51 (SD 5.54); 53.4% female). Most participants (63.6%) have a proficient-good ability to identify and manage CES early, while 36.4% were categorized as having fair-poor ability Consensus for the CES statements was achieved for 8 statements [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12] out of 12. Among these statements, most participants agreed that a patient should be suspected to have CES when they exhibited urinary difficulties of neurogenic origin (88.3%) and/or bilateral radiculopathy (85.5%); and 88.0% of them agreed that an MRI should be requested urgently when managing a patient with CES. Conversely, consensus was not achieved on statements, concerning communication with patients, patient instructions, and management decisions for suspected CES cases.
conclusionMost physiotherapists had a proficient-good ability to identify and manage CES early. The study's findings can aid in the creation or improvement of clinical standards and protocols pertaining to physiotherapists' roles in the early identification of CES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.