ReviewJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2025
Lupus anticoagulant and antiprothrombin antibodies: embracing the future.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antiphospholipid antibodies and cardiovascular thrombosis.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Severe Acquired Factor VIII Deficiency With Concomitant Lupus Anticoagulant: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- In vivo targeting of open prothrombin with the monoclonal antibody POmAb results in anticoagulation without excessive bleeding.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is a well-known laboratory test used to explore potential reasons for the prolongation of phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests. An extended clotting time in a coagulation test typically suggests a bleeding tendency, as the plasma takes longer to clot. However, a positive LAC result, defined as normalization of prolonged clotting time by adding anionic phospholipids in the system, does not necessarily imply this. In fact, quite the opposite is true: a positive LAC often strongly correlates with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, despite being conceptually counterintuitive, LAC remains extremely valuable in routine clinical practice for identifying individuals at risk for thromboembolic events. Over the years, various factors have been recognized as potential inducers of LAC, with antiphospholipid antibodies associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) playing a significant role. Today, research indicates that, among antiphospholipid antibodies, those targeting plasma proteins β
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.