Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199411›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2025

Malnutrition Risk Among the 2022 National Survey of Older Americans Act Participants: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Jaime J Gahche, Lydia McGrath, Shirley Chao, Judy Simon, Laura Borth, Mary Beth Arensberg, Johanna T Dwyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaime J GahcheOffice of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Lydia McGrathFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111.
Shirley ChaoFoodPolicy Insights, Boston, MA.
Judy SimonIndependent Nutrition Consultant, Easton, MD.
Laura BorthThe National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs (NANASP) and Defeat Malnutrition Today (DMT), Washington, DC.
Mary Beth ArensbergDirector Health Policy and Programs, Abbott Nutrition Division of Abbott, Columbus, OH.
Johanna T DwyerOffice of Dietary Supplements, NIH, Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 OD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInclusion of malnutrition risk screening information in the 2022 National Survey of Older Americans Act Participants (NSOAAP) provided a first-time opportunity to estimate malnutrition risk in a representative sample of Older Americans Act (OAA) program participants.

objectiveDescribe malnutrition risk prevalence and associated characteristics among 2022 NSOAAP participants, focusing particularly on those in home-delivered meal (HDM) and congregate meal (CM) programs.

designCross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of 5 OAA service programs. PARTICIPANTS/

settingOAA nutrition (HDM, n = 941; CM, n = 738) and non-nutrition (homemaker, n = 457; case management, n = 490; transportation, n = 905) program participants in the 2022 NSOAAP.

main outcome measuresMalnutrition risk evaluated with the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST). MST scores range 0 to 5, with ≥2 = malnutrition risk. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Malnutrition risk prevalence was estimated within each OAA program and by demographic and health characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed for HDM and CM participants to assess associations between malnutrition risk and duration of OAA nutrition program participation, food insecurity, and percentage of daily food intake from OAA meals, after adjusting for covariates.

resultsTotal malnutrition risk prevalence was 19.5%; by program type, it was 19.4% HDM, 16.7% CM, 22.5% homemaker, 22.1% case management, and 21.4% transportation, with no statistically significant differences between programs. Participants receiving HDMs for 2 to 5 years were 72% less likely to be at malnutrition risk compared with those receiving HDMs for ≤6 months (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.19-0.44; P < .05). No association between malnutrition risk and length receiving meals among CM participants was observed. Associations between risk and percentage daily food intake from OAA meals or food insecurity were not observed for HDM or CM participants.

conclusionApproximately one-fifth of OAA program participants were at malnutrition risk in 2022 across all programs, and evidence suggested that risk may decline with continued HDM OAA nutrition program participation.

Indexed as

Food ServicesMalnutritionAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMealsMiddle AgedNutrition AssessmentNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCongregate mealsHome-delivered meal programsMalnutrition Screening ToolMSTOlder adultsUndernutrition

Identifiers

PMID40199411
PMCPMC12353760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.