Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199358›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Respiration shapes response speed and accuracy with a systematic time lag.

Cosima Harting, Lena Hehemann, Lisa Stetza, Christoph Kayser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cosima HartingBiology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.
Lena HehemannBiology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.
Lisa StetzaBiology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.
Christoph KayserBiology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-5704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory-cognitive functions are intertwined with physiological processes such as the heart beat or respiration. For example, we tend to align our respiratory cycle to expected events or actions. This happens during sports but also in computer-based tasks and systematically structures respiratory phase around relevant events. However, studies also show that trial-by-trial variations in respiratory phase shape brain activity and the speed or accuracy of individual responses. We show that both phenomena-the alignment of respiration to expected events and the explanatory power of the respiratory phase on behaviour-co-exist. In fact, both the average respiratory phase of an individual relative to the experimental trials and trial-to-trial variations in respiratory phase hold significant predictive power on behavioural performance, in particular for reaction times. This co-modulation of respiration and behaviour emerges regardless of whether an individual generally breathes faster or slower and is strongest for the respiratory phase about 2 s prior to participant's responses. The persistence of these effects across 12 datasets with 277 participants performing sensory-cognitive tasks confirms the robustness of these results, and suggests a profound and time-lagged influence of structured respiration on sensory-motor responses.

Indexed as

CognitionReaction TimeRespirationAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultcognitionperceptionrespiration

Identifiers

PMID40199358
PMCPMC11978463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.