Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199356›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Viewing conditions predict evolutionary diversity in avian plumage colour.

Jamie Dunning, Catherine Sheard, John A Endler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamie DunningDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8234-8526
Catherine SheardPalaeobiology Research Group, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
John A EndlerLife and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-7627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals communicate using multiple sensory channels, including via vision. The colourful plumage of birds is a model system to study visual communication, having evolved through a complex interplay of processes, acting not only on the ability of a plumage patch to convey information, but also in response to physiological and environmental factors. Although much research on inter-specific variation in bird plumage has concentrated on sexual selection, much less has considered the role of non-sexual selection and how it is affected by the joint effects of avian viewing conditions and receiver vision. Here, we combined a taxonomically diverse database of avian plumage reflectance measurements with bird vision models, habitat and behavioural data to test the effect of three factors that affect viewing conditions-habitat openness, migratory preference and diel activity-on avian plumage contrast, accounting for shared evolutionary history and variation in avian visual systems. We find that habitat structure and migratory preference predicted plumage visual contrast, especially for females. Our study therefore demonstrates the important role of non-sexually selected traits, viewing conditions and bird vision, in shaping avian plumage contrast.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBirdsFeathersPigmentationAnimal MigrationAnimalsColorEcosystemFemaleMalebird plumagehabitat effectslight environmentplumage colourspectrophotometryviewing conditions

Identifiers

PMID40199356
PMCPMC11978446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.