ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2024
Exploring the Latest Advances in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics.
Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Health for Precision Prevention.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this review was to identify and analyze the most recent research and prevailing trends in the field of Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics (PHEI).
methodsWe adopted a methodical search approach that was similar to the one used in the previous edition of the PHEI section's synopsis. We conducted a thorough search on PubMed using an extensive range of keywords that cover topics related to public health, epidemiological surveillance, and medical informatics. As a result, there were 840 publications found on PHEI. The three section editors carefully examined the references. Afterwards, nine articles were selected as potential contenders for the "best paper" awards. The candidates underwent a thorough peer-review process that included six external reviewers, as well as the section editors and the two chief editors of the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Every paper was subjected to a total of five reviews.
resultsThe search yielded 840 references, and after review of the nine "best paper" candidates, only two papers emerged as strong contenders for the "best paper" award. The first candidate paper, which received a broader consensus, explored the integration of clinical language models in medicine. This model envisioned working alongside physicians, providing real-time guidance at the point of care. The second candidate fo-cused on developing personalized digital interventions to effectively increase short-term physical activity.
conclusionThe recent PHEI section review has identified a significant rise in the quantity of pertinent stud-ies in comparison to the previous edition. The search strategy for this year incorporated precision medicine-related keywords for the first time, which may have led to an increased number of retrieved publications specifically related to PHEI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.