Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199305›Full record

SynthesisYearbook of medical informatics2024

Health Information Exchange: Contributions from 2023.

Meryl Bloomrosen, Sue S Feldman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meryl BloomrosenAmerican Medical Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sue S FeldmanGraduate Programs in Health Informatics, Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo summarize the recent literature and research and present a selection of the best papers published online and in print in 2023 related to health information exchange (HIE).

methodsUsing Covidence as a screening and analysis tool, a systematic review of the literature was independently conducted by the two section editors. Seven studies emerged as suitable for final IMIA Yearbook consideration.

resultsAmong the papers reviewed, three major themes emerged: clinical services utilization, continuity of care, and public and population health. These themes represent an increased breadth and depth of HIE application.

conclusionsReview of the literature suggested more studies with the use of data from HIEs, perhaps suggesting increased trust in data accuracy, adequacy, and completeness. The section editors noted the increase in papers from diverse countries describing applications of HIEs suggesting more widespread implementation of HIEs worldwide. As health data standards are developed and adopted globally, this could set the stage for increased international health data exchange. The larger corpus of 2023 literature reviewed resulted in conversations by the section editors on the changing landscape of the expanding, maturing, and innovative use cases for HIEs and HIE data. This landscape bears continued watching in 2024.

Indexed as

Health Information ExchangeContinuity of Patient CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID40199305
PMCPMC12020551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.