Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199304›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2024

New Horizons for Consumer-Mediated Health Information Exchange.

Prashila Dullabh, Rina Dhopeshwarkar, Priyanka J Desai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Health Information Exchange: Contributions from 2023.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Digital Health for Precision Prevention.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prashila DullabhNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rina DhopeshwarkarNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Priyanka J DesaiNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this paper, we discuss current trends in consumer-mediated health information exchange (HIE) within the U.S. and globally, including new approaches, relevant standards that support HIE and interoperability centered around the patient, remaining challenges, and potential future directions.

methodsWe conducted a narrative review of the peer-reviewed and gray literature to characterize the current HIE landscape in relation to patient-centered data. Our searches targeted literature in three key areas related to consumer-mediated HIE: policy and initiatives, standards, and the technology landscape.

resultsWe discuss current trends in consumer-mediated exchange within the U.S. and globally, focusing on policies, standards, and technology that support information exchange centered around the patient. We also outline remaining challenges and potential future directions.

conclusionsThe current landscape in the U.S. and globally supports a more patient-centered care model. Ongoing advances in technology and data standards provide the technical infrastructure to empower consumers to electronically exchange their information with different stakeholders in ways not possible just a few years ago. These advancements hold great promise for patients to play a more central role in sharing their information in support of more patient-centered care. Additional research and analyzes along with public policies are needed.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationHealth Information ExchangeHumansPatient-Centered CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40199304
PMCPMC12020518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.