Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198991›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025

Repeated measures analysis for steady-state evoked potentials.

Amir Norouzpour, Tawna L Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amir NorouzpourSpencer Center for Vision Research, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, USA. Electronic address: amirn@stanford.edu.
Tawna L RobertsSpencer Center for Vision Research, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, USA.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Afferent and Efferent Visual Systems During Abnormal Vision DevelopmentR01EY029307 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, TAWNA · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBrain response to repetitive stimuli generates steady-state evoked potentials (ssEP) that vary depending on the experimental conditions. To analyze these responses, Fourier measurements extracted from ssEP data require statistical techniques to differentiate neural responses across various experimental conditions within the same participant(s). In this study, we introduce new statistical methods to compare multiple dependent clusters of discrete Fourier measurements corresponding to multiple experimental conditions.

methodsWe present two statistics: 1) The first statistic is derived from repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for complex numbers, used to compare multiple dependent circular clusters of Fourier estimates under the assumption of equal variance across the clusters. 2) The second statistic is employed when either the assumption of circularity within the clusters or the assumption of equal variance across the clusters is violated. In this case, we derive the statistic from the rank-sum Friedman test to compare multiple related clusters of complex numbers.

resultsWe demonstrated the validity of the statistics using simulated and empirical ssEP data. Our methods offer robust statistical tools that maintain a constant Type-I error of 0.05 in all conditions, including equal or unequal variance-covariance matrix of the real and imaginary components of Fourier estimates across the circular and elliptical clusters, even in the presence of outliers in the dataset. Furthermore, our statistics demonstrate a lower Type-II error compared to repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (rmMANOVA).

conclusionThe statistical methods enable us to compare multiple dependent clusters of Fourier estimates corresponding to multiple experimental conditions within the same participant(s), whether or not the variance is equal across the circular or elliptical clusters, even with outliers in the dataset.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultFemaleFourier AnalysisHumansMaleAnalysis of varianceElectroencephalographyEvoked potentialsFourier analysisRank-sum test

Identifiers

PMID40198991
PMCPMC13185788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.