ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2025
Visual profiling and vision screening of preschool children in Greenland.
Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The global prevalence of horizontal strabismus: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on ethnic variation.Survey of ophthalmologyPooled it
- Effectiveness of a Preschool Vision Screening Program for Early Detection of Refractive Errors: Evidence From a Prospective Study in Uzbekistan.AJPM focus · 2026Article
- The global prevalence of horizontal strabismus: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on ethnic variation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in six towns in Greenland to establish normative data on refraction and visual acuity in preschool children and to develop a practical vision screening method suited to Greenlandic healthcare needs. We recruited 274 children born in 2017 through kindergartens in six towns. The only exclusion criterion was known eye disease under ophthalmological care. Vision screening was performed by an optometrist, assessing distance visual acuity with Kay Pictures, binocular near visual acuity with Lea Symbols, stereoacuity with the Lang II Test, and non-cycloplegic refraction using the Plusoptix A12R. An ophthalmologist conducted follow-up examinations, including cycloplegic refraction, within one week. Of 532 eligible children, 274 participated (144 boys, 133 girls; mean age 4.7 years). The mean visual acuity for the worse- and best-seeing eye was 0.05 (±0.16 SD) and 0.01 (±0.12 SD) logMAR, respectively. Cycloplegic myopia (≤-0.5 dioptres) was found in 5%, while 18% had hyperopia >+2.0 dioptres. Most preschool children in Greenland have good visual acuity and mild hyperopia. Vision screening combining the Plusoptix autorefractor and distance visual acuity demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89%) for identifying children needing further evaluation. Implementing this vision screening method in kindergartens is recommended to improve early detection and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.