ArticlePain2025
Effects of sleep and circadian rest-activity rhythms on daily pain severity in women with temporomandibular disorders.
Article in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian Regulation and Pain: A Systematic Review of the Association Between Rest-Activity Rhythm and Pain-Related Outcomes.Clocks & sleep · 2026Review
- Rethinking Pain Assessment: Subjective Scales, Biomarkers, and Multimodal Integration.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractAlthough a robust connection between sleep and pain is established, the extent to which circadian rest-activity rhythms contribute toward unique variations in pain, beyond what is elucidated by sleep, remains uncertain. Furthermore, it is largely unknown whether sleep and circadian rest-activity rhythms have interactive effects on daily pain severity. Using wrist actigraphy and daily pain diaries, data from 140 women with temporomandibular disorders and insomnia symptoms were analyzed over a 14-day period. Sleep duration and continuity were quantified by using total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO), and circadian rest-activity rhythms were characterized with the Relative Amplitude (indicating strength/robustness of rest-activity rhythm) and Intradaily Variability metrics (representing rhythm fragmentation). Linear mixed-effects modeling revealed that both TST ( b = -0.11, P = 0.006) and WASO ( b = 0.18, P = 0.006) from the previous night, along with Relative Amplitude ( b = -2.56, P = 0.001) from the past 24 hours, predicted next-day pain severity. Among the 4 interaction effects tested, both Intradaily Variability ( b = 1.52, P = 0.034) and Relative Amplitude ( b = -1.52, P = 0.003) moderated the relationship between WASO and next-day pain severity; on days characterized by less robustness (lower Relative Amplitude) or greater fragmentation (higher Intradaily Variability) in the circadian rest-activity rhythm, the positive association between previous night WASO and next-day pain severity intensified. These findings highlight the complex interplay among sleep, circadian rest-activity rhythms, and pain. While preliminary, our findings indicate that interventions aimed at improving both sleep and restoring circadian rhythms may provide enhanced benefits for managing chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.