ArticlePloS one2025
A pesticide residue detection model for food based on NIR and SERS.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidics-Integrated Spectroscopic Technologies for Food Safety and Quality Assessment: From Complex-Matrix Processing to On-Site Decision-Making.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- SERS-Based Detection of Food Contaminants: From Laboratory Sensitivity to Practical Implementation-Bottlenecks and Pathways to Standardization.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in SERS-Based Detection of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Food: A Critical and Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-Enabled Spectroscopic Sensing: Building a New Paradigm for Precision Detection of Pesticide Residues.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Spectroscopic and Imaging Technologies Combined with Machine Learning for Intelligent Perception of Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a multivariate calibration model based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIR) and Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) techniques, aiming to achieve efficient and accurate detection of pesticide residues in food by integrating the spectral information from both techniques. The study utilizes the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion-based Variable Space Iterative Optimization algorithm (HSIC-VSIO) for feature variable selection, and combines it with Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) to build a spectral fusion quantitative model. Experimental results show that the calibration set Root Mean Square Error (RMSE1) of the NIR and SERS feature-layer fusion model is 0.160, the prediction set RMSE (RMSE2) is 0.185, the prediction set coefficient of determination (R²) is 0.988, and the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) is 8.290. Compared to single spectral techniques, the NIR and SERS spectral feature-layer fusion method demonstrates significant superiority in detecting pesticide residues in complex matrix samples. The findings further validate the high sensitivity of SERS technology in detecting low concentrations of pesticides and show that the feature-layer fusion method effectively suppresses matrix interference, enhancing the model's generalization ability. This study provides a reliable tool for the rapid and accurate detection of pesticide residues in food and offers new insights into the application of spectral analysis technologies in the food safety field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.