Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198712›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Telemedicine in the Clinical Care of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Scoping Review.

Fernanda Gonçalves Ferreira Salvador, Mayumi Duarte Wakimoto, Claudia Cristina Jardim Duarte, Luis V Lapão, Henrique Silveira, Cláudia Maria Valete

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernanda Gonçalves Ferreira SalvadorGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Associate Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health, LA-REAL, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-0277
Mayumi Duarte WakimotoHealth Surveillance Service, Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Claudia Cristina Jardim DuarteLaboratory of Clinical Research and Surveillance in Leishmaniasis, Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luis V LapãoGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Associate Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health, LA-REAL, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Henrique SilveiraGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Associate Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health, LA-REAL, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cláudia Maria ValeteLaboratory of Clinical Research and Surveillance in Leishmaniasis, Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

Foundation for Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) represent a global public health problem. Telemedicine uses telecommunications to deliver remote healthcare services when patients and providers are separated by distance. Using digital health technologies to offer medical care remotely to NTDs can be an important strategy for reducing inequalities in access but is challenging in low-and middle-income settings. The objective of the current review was to identify and summarize international evidence on the use of telemedicine for clinical care of patients with NTDs around the world based on a scoping review protocol. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 422 articles were extracted from the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, and after removing 129 duplicates, 285 studies were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria. A total of 8 articles were included for data extraction, half of them published after 2021 (n=4). Four studies were focused on dermatological diseases, like leprosy and leishmaniasis, and the other diseases found were dengue (n=2), trachoma (n=1) and cysticercosis (n=1). Most telemedicine interventions in NTDs involved Primary Health Care teams (n=5). Studies that evaluated the accuracy of remote diagnosis demonstrated good effectiveness for leprosy, trachoma and complications of neurocysticercosis. There was a reduction in the need for specialized in-person medical consultations with telemedicine for the care of dengue fever and some dermatological NTDs; and an improvement in the quality of clinical monitoring of cutaneous leishmaniasis using mobile health was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although we observed a small recent increase in academic research on the theme, there is a gap in recommendations for the clinical management of NTDs through telemedicine in the literature. The feasibility and potential for telemedicine-based NTDs diagnosis and treatment have been demonstrated in only a few settings/countries, revealing that this resource is still largely underutilized.

Indexed as

Neglected DiseasesTelemedicineTropical MedicineHumans

Identifiers

PMID40198712
PMCPMC12011287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.