ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Strategies to build trust in the conduct of clinical trials: Stakeholders' views in a qualitative study in Ghana.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guide on Selection of Optimal Motivational Themes for Use in a Clinical Trial Recruiting Black US Adults: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The Silent Risk of Sudan Virus: A Review Addressing Global Health Vulnerabilities.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While clinical trials have evolved and improved over time producing significant advances in diagnosis, treatment and prevention of diseases, there are equally key challenges such as feasibility of some clinical trials and most importantly the issue of trust in the conduct of clinical trials. Thus, this study provides scientific evidence to address challenges associated with clinical trials conduct as well as a framework describing appropriate trust building strategies to guide the conduct of future clinical trial studies in Ghana and beyond. The study used qualitative research approach where 48 in-depth and Key informant interviews were conducted with participants between June and August, 2019. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded into themes using QSR Nvivo 12 software before thematic content analysis. The results revealed low level of trust in the conduct of clinical trials in Ghana. Participants recommended several trust building strategies to improve trust across the clinical trial cycle. Pre-implementation strategies such as effective stakeholder engagement and strengthening clinical trial regulatory bodies were recommended to build community trust. Implementation strategies such as effective monitoring, addressing issues of untrustworthiness and misconceptions regarding drawing and use of blood samples, improved informed consent procedures as well as post-implementation strategy such as timely feedback to clinical trial communities were highly recommended to build trust in clinical trials conduct. Trust is an important factor affecting clinical trials conduct especially in developing countries. The need to invest in national and community level trust-building activities through appropriate stakeholder engagement and effective monitoring systems by clinical trial regulatory bodies are critical strategies to improve trust in clinical trials conduct.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.