Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198671›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Development and evaluation of fluorescent recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA)-based method for rapid detection of Necator americanus.

Jia-Rui Liang, Shu-Ning Yan, Han-Yin Yang, Shuo Yang, Yu-Juan Shen, Le-Le Huo, Yu-Chun Cai, Zi-Ran Mo, Bin Zheng, Bin Xu and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Rapid and simultaneous detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jia-Rui LiangNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases at Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai, China.
Shu-Ning YanNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases at Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai, China.
Han-Yin YangNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases at Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai, China.
Shuo YangNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, WHO Collaborating Center for Tropical Diseases, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Juan ShenNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, WHO Collaborating Center for Tropical Diseases, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Le-Le HuoNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, WHO Collaborating Center for Tropical Diseases, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Chun CaiNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases at Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai, China.
Zi-Ran MoThe institutes of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Bin ZhengNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases at Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai, China.
Bin XuNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases at Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0005-9990-2155
Wei HuNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, WHO Collaborating Center for Tropical Diseases, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Shanghai, China.

Funding

National Major Science and Technology Projects of ChinaScience and Technology Leading Talent Team in Inner Mongolia Autonomous RegionShanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Special Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNecator americanus is the predominant species causing hookworm infections in humans. Despite advancements in prevention strategies, mild cases of infection still occur, highlighting the need for improved detection technology. Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) is an isothermal molecular diagnostic known for its sensitivity, speed, portability, and widespread application in detecting various pathogens. Although several molecular assays are available for N. americanus, they have limitations in detecting mild N. americanus infections.

methodsFluorescent RPA primers and probes targeting the N. americanus internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) gene were developed. The method's detection limit was assessed via serial dilution of genomic DNA. Specificity was confirmed against Clonorchis sinensis, Schistosoma japonicum, Fasciola hepatica, Ascaris lumbricoides, Enterobius vermicularis and Ancylostoma duodenale. Thirty samples identified as positive by Kato-Katz, along with 11 samples identified as negative by the method, were tested to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of fluorescent RPA. Additionally, 287 field samples were tested for validation with these methods. All positive samples were identified as either N. americanus or A. duodenale.

resultsThis study successfully developed a fluorescent RPA assay targeting the ITS2 gene of N. americanus. The length of the amplified fragment was 237 bp. Optimized conditions were achieved, resulting in a minimum detection limit of 1fg/µL, with no cross-reactivity with other pathogens. In laboratory validation, the fluorescent RPA assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity (30/30) and 100% specificity (11/11) compared to the Kato-Katz, and 100% sensitivity (29/29) and 91.7% specificity (11/12) when compared to the semi-nested PCR. In field validation using human fecal samples, the fluorescent RPA assay showed a sensitivity of 90.0% (36/40) and a specificity of 91.1% (225/247) compared to the Kato-Katz. And the sensitivity of the fluorescent RPA method compared to the semi-nested PCR method was 100% (34/34), while the specificity was 90.5% (229/252).

conclusionsThe fluorescent RPA assay presents a rapid and dependable method for detecting N. americanus in fecal samples. Its high sensitivity and specificity provide significant utility for field surveillance and early identification of N. americanus infections. This advancement could facilitate the rapid molecular diagnosis of N. americanus disease in hookworm-endemic regions.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesNecator americanusNecatoriasisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAnimalsDNA, HelminthDNA PrimersFecesHumansRecombinasesSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, HelminthDNA PrimersRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID40198671
PMCPMC12011292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.