Observational studyEuropean thyroid journal2025
Gender impact on safety and efficacy in lenvatinib treated patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (GISEL study).
Observational study in European thyroid journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about sex differences in lenvatinib treatment safety and efficacy. Methods: Real-word retrospective Italian multicenter study enrolling patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer treated with lenvatinib. Results: A total of 138 patients (64 females) were included, with a median follow-up of 26 months (2-72). More men performed physical activities (34% vs 17%, P = 0.024). The frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption was higher in men (58% vs 33%, P = 0.003; 45% vs 17%, P = 0.001). We did not find sex differences in lenvatinib dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs) (78% females vs 85% males). Ninety-nine percent of patients developed at least one adverse event (AE), with no sex difference in their number and the time to first AE. Severe AEs occurred in 74% of males and 66% of females (P = 0.398), with a mean dose of 18.2 mg (±5.7), and a median time to the first serious AE of 9 weeks (1-154). Stomatitis/mucositis and hematological disorders were more frequent in females (48% vs 30%, P = 0.016; 17% vs 4%, P = 0.011). Gastrointestinal disorders were higher in males (15% vs 2%, P = 0.010). Eighty-seven patients interrupted lenvatinib due to AEs (median time: 3 months (0-48), mean dose: 17 mg ±5.5). Discontinuation occurred in 21 patients, five for severe AEs. No sex differences were found in progression-free survival, overall survival or disease control rate. Liver metastases were associated with disease progression (HR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.06-13.12, P = 0.040) or death (HR: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.75-13.25, P = 0.002) only in females. Conclusion: Lenvatinib is effective in both sexes and exhibits a good safety profile, with a sex difference in the frequencies of some adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.