Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198623›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Diagnostic performance of a novel point-of-care test for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Sudan: A Comparative Accuracy Study.

Elfadil Abass, Durria Mansour, Zaki Abdalla, Hassan Altaher, Mootaz Sliman, Hussam Osman, Rabie Ali Babiker, Mohamed Salah, Elmohaned Omer, Elwaleed Elamin and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elfadil AbassDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Durria MansourAhfad Biomedical Research Laboratory (ABRL), School of Health Sciences, Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, Sudan.
Zaki AbdallaLaboratory and Blood Bank Administration, Ministry of Health, Gedaref, Sudan.
Hassan AltaherMahmoud Abdalla Idris Medical Compound, Gedaref Teaching Hospital, Ministry of Health, Gedaref, Sudan.
Mootaz SlimanMahmoud Abdalla Idris Medical Compound, Gedaref Teaching Hospital, Ministry of Health, Gedaref, Sudan.
Hussam OsmanFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Liwa College, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Rabie Ali BabikerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gedaref, Gedaref, Sudan.
Mohamed SalahDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kassala University, Kassala, Sudan.
Elmohaned OmerMahmoud Abdalla Idris Medical Compound, Gedaref Teaching Hospital, Ministry of Health, Gedaref, Sudan.
Elwaleed ElaminDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Alzaeem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Alexander VisekrunaInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Ulrich SteinhoffInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2141-7756
Rouzbeh MahdaviInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

Ahfad University for WomenLoewe Center Druid within the Hessian Excellence Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsThis study enrolled 107 VL suspects who attended a health centre in Gedaref between October 2022 and June 2023. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the performance of the new index test (INgezimLeishma-CROM) with the comparator test (IT-LEISH) and parasitological examination as reference standard.

resultsOf 107 VL suspects screened by parasitological examination, 77 VL patients were smear positive and 30 were smear negative. Independent serological testing of these patients using INgezim Leishma-CROM showed a sensitivity of 98.7% [95% CI 92.23-99.97] and specificity of 92.5% [95% CI 75.71-99.09]. For IT-LEISH, both sensitivity [95% CI 84.39-97.20] and specificity [95% CI 75.71-99.09] were 92.5%. INgezim Leishma-CROM demonstrated increased diagnostic accuracy (97.2%) compared to IT-LEISH RDT (92.5%). Both RDTs gave positive results in 2 cases from the smear negative group that were previously treated for VL. All other non-VL cases (malaria, typhoid, brucellosis) were negative in both RDTs, showing 100% specificity, while VL patients co-infected with malaria were positive in both tests. Within the smear-negative group, 3 VL symptomatic cases that had been previously treated but still show clinical signs were all positive with INgezim Leishma-CROM but only 2 cases were positive with IT-LEISH.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineLeishmaniasis, VisceralPoint-of-Care TestingAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySudanYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40198623
PMCPMC11978112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.