Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198610›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Implementation and impact of mhealth in the management of diabetes mellitus in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Franklin Okechukwu Dike, Jean Claude Mutabazi, Ezekiel Musa, Blessing Chinenye Ubani, Ahmed Sherif Isa, Chidiebele Malachy Ezeude, Henry Iheonye, Isah Idris Ainavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franklin Okechukwu DikeUniversity of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Internal Medicine, Akwa Ibom, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4773-520X
Jean Claude MutabaziDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Ezekiel MusaKaduna State University, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Blessing Chinenye UbaniUniversity of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Internal Medicine, Akwa Ibom, Nigeria.
Ahmed Sherif IsaStellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Chidiebele Malachy EzeudeNnamdi Azikiwe University, Internal Medicine, Awka, Anambra, Nigeria.
Henry IheonyeFederal Teaching Hospital Lokoja, Internal Medicine, Kogi, Nigeria.
Isah Idris AinaviKaduna State University, Chemical Pathology and Immunology, Kaduna, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed the concept of mobile health to support healthcare systems delivery worldwide. Mobile health (mHealth) involves using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for health care provision or delivery services. In the context of Africa, a region that has witnessed a significant increase in mobile phone availability and usage in the last decade and a corresponding rise in the incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus, this study has global implications. We conducted a systematic review on the extent of mHealth implementation in managing diabetes mellitus in Africa. We estimated its impact on achieving desired glycemic targets, sustained control, and preventing complications in the past decade. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The studies assessing the utilization of mHealth in managing patients with diabetes mellitus in Africa were considered based on the PICO method: Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes. MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry were searched. Two authors, independent of each other, screened titles and abstracts retrieved using the search strategy, retrieved the full-text articles, and assessed them for eligibility, extracting data after that. A third independent reviewer was brought in to resolve disagreements between the two authors by discussion. The revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. A narrative synthesis of extracted data was done due to the paucity of eligible studies, and the results were summarized in a meta-analysis.

resultsNone of the six included studies measured the mean FPG or percentage changes as primary outcomes. Five measured the percentage change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of the study. The percentage change in HbA1c from the baseline ranged from 3.6% to 20.53%, achieving significance in three studies. In the meta-analysis the overall WMD (95% CI) was 0.992 (0.48, 1.50). This, in combination with a high z score of 3.822, p <0.001 suggests a statistically significant overall effect that is not likely due to chance. However, a considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 63.9%, p = 0.026) was present implying that the observed effect may not be generalizable to all the studies due to differences in study characteristics in this case most likely sample size and duration of study. None of the studies addressed the secondary outcomes of measuring the direct relationships between these mHealth interventions and the prevention or early detection of diabetes complications.

conclusionOverall, there was a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c levels among individuals living with type 2 diabetes in Africa following mHealth interventions. Few studies were included in the meta-analysis with significant heterogeneity. Therefore, we recommend more well-designed randomized controlled trials to investigate the implementation and efficacy of mHealth in the management of diabetes mellitus in Africa. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021218674.

Identifiers

PMID40198610
PMCPMC11978007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.