Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198600›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Analysis of the utilization of traditional medicine in Korea over 10 years (2013-2022): A repeated cross-sectional study using national health insurance data.

Minjung Park, Yoon Jae Lee, Seungwon Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minjung ParkCollege of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Jae LeeJaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seungwon ShinCollege of Korean Medicine, Sangji University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6160-0339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to figure out the changes in traditional Korean medicine (TKM) utilization over the last decade, using the complete dataset of all claims submitted to the National Health Insurance (NHI) system in Korea.

methodsThis is a repeated cross-sectional study between 2013 and 2022. To observe TKM healthcare resources, we collected the number of TKM institutions, beds, and doctors. To observe changes in the utilization of TKM services, we collected the number of patients, claims, and medical expenses submitted to NHI. Data was analyzed according to inpatient/outpatient and hospitals/clinics. The compound annual growth rate was calculated.

resultsThe growth was observed in the number of TKM hospitals, beds, and doctors. The changes in the claim count and the number of patients told us that TKM is going through a structural shift into hospital-centered services, even though the total number of patients utilizing TKM services decreased. The increase in TKM medical expenses was not merely a result of general inflation but reflects an increase in utilization of TKM services.

conclusionsThe key findings include a significant increase in inpatient services of TKM hospitals and medical expenses. The diversification of diagnostic and treatment methods highlights the evolving nature of TKM. Future research should focus on a more comprehensive study to examine the sociocultural and clinical factors influencing TKM utilization.

Indexed as

Medicine, Korean TraditionalNational Health ProgramsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID40198600
PMCPMC11977961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.